How About Dr. Carson?

First, let me say that I am definitely not on board with the draft Ben Carson for President movement, mainly because I don't think we need any more personality cult worship in the White House.  But, also secondarily, because he's (reportedly) at least wishy-washy on the 2nd Amendment.

But, how about Dr. Ben as Veterans Advocacy Commission chairman?  With the entire VA budget at his disposal and carte blanche to gut the administration's bureaucracy and institute redundant systems competing for the care of those Vets...incentivized financially toward the overall quality of care.

Simultaneously, I'd really love to see Shinseki spend one day in a very public stockade for every single day of Veteran secret-wait-list time.

It's just an idea.  What's wrong with it?  Anybody else think it makes sense to offer a free-market solution to a statist nightmare?

On a side note, if he does indeed have political aspirations, how much of a feather in his cap would be the claim that he cured the VA of all its ills in 6 months, while Obama couldn't be bothered with it for 6 years?  Frankly, if Congress had the stones to create such a position, I'd take that job just to show it could be done.

Thoughts?

Machinations (UPDATED 05/29)

Harry Reid and his BLM-buddy Korntz said that Bundy getting his cattle back was not going to be the end of that encounter, and you'd better believe it.  FedGuv got punked and embarrassed out in Bunkerville, and payback by a tyrant is the bitchiest of bitches.

From Bubba, witness the machinations of this Congressman's scheme to very soon begin executing American citizens.

(Nevada Congressman Steven) Horsford lays the first brick for the foundation of the government’s overblown slaughter of innocent Americans whose only “crime” was to have the nerve to stand up to the Federal Government. 

There are no checkpoints, there are no “roving bands of militia” with a persistent armed presence hovering around in the area. No constituents called Horsford. The Congressmen is LYING.

 

If, like me, you've been watching the AMC mini-series TURN (about America's first spy ring) and mulling over the parallels of that time of Independents and Loyalists with the essence of our current situation, can you help but marvel at the similarities?

 

It begins.

Updated:

Let us just assume that they "considered but rejected" only momentarily the newly approved directive (instituted in 2010, Directive Number 3025.18), giving the president authority to use military force against civilians, on American soil...
 

“Federal action, including the use of federal military forces, is authorized when necessary to protect the federal property or functions,” the directive states.

When did that happen, you ask?

 

While you were sleeping.

 

Tick tock...

From TL Davis

This.

The one thing we need to know is that we are not functional and cannot get functional without dropping the mask of propriety we cling to so desperately. I understand those who train, but that is with the idea of survival and to be honest, I think if you are active in this movement, you will not survive the first round. Might as well buy that cow right now. Either you will die attempting to do something constructive for the movement, or you will be targeted and taken down before you raise a finger in resistance.

 

As they say in the parlance, I'm down with that.

 

Cue Mr. Petty...

 

You take it on faith, you take it to the heart.

The way-ay-iting is the hardest part...

Feed Your Weapon

Without a doubt, the most serious, most "squared away", person I met at Brock's PATCON, was Sandman.  He commands some 500 troops in the Greater Appalachian Redoubt.  He didn't know me from Adam, but when I introduced myself, he looked me in the eye, handed me his card, and said, "If you ever need anything..."

 

If you're a Patriot, he is your weapon.

 

But, as happens with every one of us, life has thrown him a curve.  And, he needs some help.

 

I don't know the details of the crisis, but a couple of funding options can be accessed here, and here.

 

Feed him.

 

 

Not Just Good Advice for THOSE Christians

But also, for those near-bouts these parts...the Land of Livermush.

From The Captain's Journal, via Mike at Cold Fury...

Christians have been run out of Mesopotamia, killed and tortured in Egypt, and are being brutalized all over the world. And the evil leader of this Islamic group in Nigeria claims that he has converted the girls to Islam.

He can “convert” the girls because all he has to do is force them under threat of death to say a few things and wear a few more clothes. Islam has no Holy Spirit who moves as He will and does what he wishes, converting the hearts of His people. Rather, it is a man-made religion, concocted by a violent and self serving seventh century warlord, child abuser, pedophile and murderer for the purpose of keeping his roving band of hoodlums and ne’er-do-wells together. It’s pronouncements are ad hoc groupings of ridiculous assertions, and the only thing not illogical in all it its literature was stolen from other faiths. The seeds of violent subjugation are within the texts of Islam itself. It isn’t a religion of peace. It’s a religion of perverts and totalitarians.

Christians can preachy preach the gospel of pacifism if they want to. They can conflate the Bible to mean that Christians must be a doormat for the world. But it was preachers who supplied the moral underpinnings of the American war for independence. There is nothing necessary in the modern squishy Christianity we hear and see today. It’s a choice because at the moment it’s convenient to make that choice and feel morally superior to everyone else.

But children are dying all over the world. As long as Christians want to mouth silly platitudes to parishioners and congregants, Christian children will continue to die, and Christians will have to flee for their lives. The solution lies in arming themselves and waging the good fight against Islamists everywhere. A well placed .308 to the whole body, or several rounds of 5.56 to the head and chest, or a 230 grain .45 fat boy through the stomach should do just fine at stopping the Islamists in Nigeria.

 

And Islam isn't the only religion of perverts and totalitarians that Christians need be armed, nay well-armed, against.  Consider the coming spawn of that marriage of queers and settled-science climate-wealth-spreaders, and their violent subjugating schemes.

 

Take one of those cloaks, and sell it.  Then, buy this (it has the thing that goes up!).  And these.

 

This material is assuredly going to be on the test.

Why Benghazi Matters To Me

And why it should matter to you.

I have an old friend named Bob, who travels extensively as a Tour Accountant for Big Rock Shows.

As a Tour Accountant, he gets flown to swanky tourist places like Paris and London and Hong Kong, but he also has to travel to places that might not be so swanky (or safe).  So far as I know, he doesn't necessarily get much say as to where.  I do know that whither goeth the talent, there goeth Bob.

And while he's there, and not accounting for Big Rock Tour business, he likes to spend any downtime seeing what there is to see and experiencing local culture (beer).  As an American with some coin, he's free to do so, but wary to keep away from unsavory areas, whether because of his projected "means" or by simply being an American.  As I'm sure anyone can imagine, just being non-native can lead to trouble in some parts of the world.  Such is the nature of the world.  Such is the nature of many cities in the US, as we know.

But, let's imagine what would happen if Bob wandered into the wrong neighborhood and got himself abducted, violated, and then executed.  Questions of "why" he was abducted wouldn't immediately be relevant, and only serve, at best, to legitimize his capture.

 

First thing I'd expect my country's representatives (there in the immediate area, as well as here at home) to do, is assess my friend's situation and drop everything else to secure his release.  Everyone who fails at this would be held accountable.

 

If rescue somehow didn't or couldn't happen, but instead his captors mutilated his body before and after they murdered him, I'd want every person who had intimate knowledge of the events surrounding my friend's capture and demise to be honest and forthright about those events.  If some other Americans got involved and tried to rescue my friend, but were only able to save some Big Rock Stars and roadies and groupies, but lost their lives in the process, I'd expect to know every pertinent fact from those that were rescued.  Anyone who obstructed this would be held accountable.

 

 

If someone, anyone, misrepresented any of those details regarding the harm coming to my friend, in an effort to benefit themselves, I can't think of any reason that same person should remain alive.  I don't care how trivial or monumental that benefit, any effort to discolor the facts for financial or political profit, would be unforgivable.

What if this hypothetical "anyone" who benefitted from such a smokescreen was Dick Cheney?  Would you be ready to water-board him to get details of what happened?

I would.

And that's only if my friend's presence was an accidental wrong turn.

Consider that this person was officially assigned to that place, as an envoy of peaceful outreach, on behalf of the American people.  Even if some bastion of Liberty or Conservatism had perpetrated such stonewalling and misdirection as we've seen from this administration, I'd be the first to say, "string 'em up!"

If it was you, Mr. Carney, who claimed that an email regarding how your company would handle the news of my friend's death, plainly read as such, was really about something else, entirely?  And shortly thereafter, you and I had 3 minutes alone in an elevator?

You'd very certainly be answering to your Maker, tout de suite.

Same thing goes for any of you who pretend that Dude, that was so two years ago.  Same thing for any of you, with your righteous indignation, who squeal what difference does it make?

Same thing for you sycophants who scream that you don't care, and by implication suggest that I shouldn't care, either.

There is not a single person in the world who looks at the available information objectively and believes in their heart that the Obama administration has been honest about Benghazi's cause, or the lack of official response.  There are some who rationalize the deception in favor of their would-be savior's agenda, and want the rest of us to move on to other less-unflattering things.

Imagine that, instead of Bob, it was Chris Stevens, Glen Doherty, Tyrone Woods, or Sean Smith who was my friend, and whose death you're apparently trivializing for your own nefarious ends.  Get alone with me if you want to advance this charade.  Go ahead and lie to my face.  See how badly that turns out for you.

Someone else who I used to care about, once told me in response to my assertion that Obama lied on the campaign trail that, "They ALL lie."  Which told me that she thought it was okay, under certain conditions, for her presidential candidate to lie.

But, what about after he's no longer the candidate, but expected to actually BE the president?  What then?  Want him to still lie to me?  And to you?

He lied to us all, making those speeches at the UN, on the return ceremony for those victims, and appearing on the talk shows.  His office sent other liars out to push this lie, and are still doing so.  How despicable the original ruse, and how much worse the continued cover-up?

 

But, I don't really believe the true depths of scandal are abundantly obvious.  The political shenanigans are enough to merit Watergate-like impeachments and prison time for many in this administration.  But, I suspect (as does I think Mr. Gowdy), there was much more to Ambassador Stevens' presence in Libya that speaks sinister ill of this President and his hencepeople.

 

Like Gowdy, I'm surprised at how many people in the media presumably "bought it."  And, I'm further surprised at how casually some fellow citizens treat high crimes and treasonous acts.

 

Does it matter to you, yet?

Would Like To Have Metcha

I went to my first PATCON yesterday, and what follows is my preliminary takeaway.  Or, at least some highlights.  We'll see how the recall flows...

I was a stranger to everyone there, as were they to me.  I didn't know what to expect, but the pleasant surprises outnumbered the otherwise by about 15:1.  Personally, I think Brock (and the event) could benefit mightily from a Walmart Greeter.  That is, someone who knows what's going on and can point arriving folks in the right direction...even for a parking spot.  Even just for the value of reassuring first-timers that they're welcome, such a functionary would improve the overall experience, in my opinion.

Hi, I'm Billy.  Welcome to Spring PATCON '14.  Here's your souvenir window cling.  This your first time to Brock's place?  He's asked me to check off this list of expected attendees, so?  Very good then, why don't you back that truck in next to the peacock.  No, don't fret...he only bites Beemers.

Such might have been helpful to me, at least, because I arrived early to the advertised schedule but during a round-table discussion smokum of the peace pipe (in the "parking area", no less) of about 20 serious people (no beta-males allowed).  I wasn't sure if I was welcome to mosey in amongst 'em, but felt like I wanted to be within my limited earshot of anything serious, and knew I didn't want them to get the idea that I didn't think I belonged.  Hi, my name's Jeff, and I'm a recovering Constitutionalist Republican, I could have said, but didn't get invited to do so.  I'm sure they were all on high-alert to possible interlopers, but nobody asked for my bona fides, or shoo'd me away.  Which I was prepared to accept, either way.

Anyways...I'm glad I sauntered in, and glad I stayed, and glad I was not made to feel the least bit uncomfortable.  Plus, I'm thankful for the minor wisdom that God furnished me with two eyes and two ears and one mouth, and I was smart enough to use them in those proportions.

After the discussion wrapped up, I met David, and Pete, and Randy, and Doug(?), and then Brock, and Holly.  Later, I met Sam C., and Sandman, and Christian, and Grenadier1.  I like them all, a lot.  I hope I didn't make too big an annoyance of myself, especially when the main event had broken up and folks were clustered in a few smaller groups.  That's the way it goes when you want to fit in, but not butt in...Should I stay, should I go?  How long should I stand here looking like a dipshit?

The only things the got my back-fur up were the presentations (multiple!) pitching retro guvmint.  I actually like and agree very much with the concept of restoring the Old North State to it pre-WBTS sovereignty.  I do not, however, agree with the proffered solution of a new collective to replace the current one.  And, I did not appreciate the speaker's tendency to demonize attitudes not strictly aligned with his.  I get the feeling that I wasn't the only one with a low tolerance threshold for political advice and campaigning.

Sam K. was also in on the early round-table, and I was glad to hear his input.  I was especially glad to get his thoughtful and thought-provoking insights, without any of the other thing.  I tried to find a moment to introduce myself, but that did not happen.

 

Good weather, great company, outstanding vittles.  And, I got to add Sue (Sioux?) to the list of new friends on my way out of town.  Good people.

To all those with whom I didn't get to share a hearty handclasp, I wish I coulda metcha.  Same thing goes for the online Patriot community friends that didn't get to attend.

 

See y'all in the Fall?

Embrace The Paradox

Embrace the suck.

 

Thanks to a link (from WRSA, who else?) to this essay, Tom Baugh is my new favorite human (well, second favorite, next to myself, ha!).  It's that awesome.

 

As in "each option sucks" for the federal government, having now raised the ire of people to the point that the real kind of nut-crunching courage seems like the best course of action versus letting things drift along as before. Which is why I say paradox instead of dilemma, because the halfwits who plan this kind of crap never thought this particular outcome could happen by gearing up and intimidating people. Unpossible, as they say. Plus paradox sounds cooler.

 

While I was worried, fraught even, over whether to pull on the white hat or the black hat, Tom had the genius to point out how it doesn't even matter.  Not to us, it doesn't.  And, I feel so much better.

 

Now, I'll go read the Monkey Starving book.

Oh, and here's an unrelated piece of news to make you feel better, too...

 

HB 1439 states that laws that infringe on Missourians' right to keep and bear arms "shall be invalid in this state, shall not be recognized by this state, shall be specifically rejected by this state, and shall be considered null and void and of no effect in this state."

Griping Patriots

I submit that those folks helping themselves to a pissing contest over the Bunkerville battlefield could do themselves (and especially the rest of us) a great deal of good by quietly watching (and re-watching as necessary) this clip.

"I don't gripe to you, Reiben.  Gripes go up, not down...I don't gripe in front of you.  You should know that, as a Ranger."

FUBAR.

Impeach 'Em Both

Glenn Reynolds suggests that one reason for not impeaching Obama is "President Biden".

Which begs the question, how could you differentiate between those twin evils?

I'm with Roger L. Simon, here:

 

Anyone who now considers Benghazi a “fake scandal” is a either a complete liar or a moron. This new release of emails thanks to Judicial Watch is literally a call to arms. We will now see if there is even a figment of honesty in our mainstream media and if our elected representatives are to be trusted in any way.

 

It is our duty as citizens to put as pressure on those representatives as possible to carry through this investigation to its natural conclusion — impeachment.

 

It better be a call to action for those elected to carry out such things as impeachment proceedings.  Or, you can damn well imagine that it will be a call to arms.

Creepy-Assed Crackas

A link-fest of more items relating to the brewing ramp-up of Cowboys vs. Communists...

An item from Fred, So What?

As nearly as I can tell, a racist is one who approves of rigorous education, good English, civilized manners, minimal criminality, and responsible parenthood, among other things. I am, then, a racist. I see no reason to grovel about it.

From yesteryear, a seemingly other-end-of-spectrum (but not) piece from the Taxi Hack: Stop Being Black

Go fuck yourself. Martin Luther King is spinning in his grave. This man fought for, and was eventually shot for, just a fair chance, just simple equality for black Americans, and fifty years later, so many of them have squandered his legacy, just pissed it away. Rachel Jeantel would have a better education from a segregated black Mississippi high school in 1950 than the education she has today… she would at least be able to speak proper English and read cursive. You can thank liberal democrats, professional race hustlers, and teachers unions for that, Rachel. Martin Luther King would not approve of black gangs and illiteracy and rap culture and criminality and the disintegration of the black family and failing schools and rampant out-of-wedlock birth rates and the black holocaust that is abortion today. To suggest for a moment that Dr. King would support Trayvon Martin in any way borders on the sacrilegious.

 

Two pieces of required reading if you want to understand the evil inherent in the collective, both from William Grigg. First, this at Lew Rockwell dot com:  Thoughtcrime is Worse than Mass Murder

...and then this at Grigg's own place, Pro Libertate.  A pattern of very bad behavior, my friends.  Part of a long, brutal history of thuggery by the Bureau of "Approved" Land Rape and People Management.

Lesson to be learnt: if you aren't fighting, you're losing.

Fran Poretto says, "It might be the greatest single crime ever perpetrated against a race."

Still Bundy'd

Nope.  The demonize-Bundy tactic didn't faze me.  And, I hope that when the forces of FedGovCo and StateMediaCo are similarly aligned against me (and/or you, for that matter, gentle reader) that good people choose to see through the flash-bangs and hear beyond the noise-makers.

From over here in work-for-it-yourself land, the question of whether "X" group of people is "collectively" better off enslaved to the State than enslaved to the plantation owner is moot.  And, the point is, if those of us here in yes-we-did-build-that land are forced to comment on those others, we're going to lament the sad fact that "X"-group has chosen to trade one set of shackles for another.

That doesn't make me or Cliven dislike that group.

But, the pretense that I, or Cliven, should abandon our individuality or independence in favor of the sameness version of equality is offensive.

Cliven Bundy is out there taking their arrows, and has been for some 20-plus years.  I support his absolute fundamental right to offend every last person in America, and to be left alone by that big steamroller of homogeny.  Don't like it?  Get your own ass up off the porch.

A tip o' the cap to you, Mr. Bundy.  Some of the lightweights will fall away, but we're still with you.

How To Fail (Updated)

Is this what you'd call going "viral"?  Youtube says this video was published on April 20 (and there's no pot smoking in it!), and that it currently has over 2.7 MILLION views...and 23,000+ comments.

 

UPDATE: Well, duh...Mr. Can't Read.  That was 04/20/2012.  No wonder there was Muh-Muh-Muh-Millions of hits.  But this one is newer.  And there's also one in tribute to Milton Friedman!  Go.

 

I'd say that's getting your viral on.  H/T to Free Republic.

Very Tricky

I used to be in the pool-playing business several years ago, and have hosted trick-shot exhibitions from Mike Massey and Eddie Parker.  Parker was a money player in the 1950's, and was the basis for Walter S. Tevis' character Fast Eddie Felson (an alias that Parker sometimes used) for the great 1961 movie The Hustler.

My dear old friend Fish Camp Barbie sent this to me, and asked if I'd consider playing this guy for money.  Florian Kohler:



I told her, "Sure.  He scratches about every 2nd or 3rd shot.  Give me ball-in-hand that often, and I can beat anyone.  Note: I had trouble concentrating on the pool shots after about the 1:20 mark of the video.

Eddie Parker's exhibition was in 1999, I believe.  After his show, I asked him if there was anything I could do for him.  Could I buy him a drink, at least?  He said that if I knew a place, he'd really like a piece of pie...a good cup of coffee and a piece of apple pie.  I did, in fact, know a place.  And away we went.

While he savored his apple pie, I asked him about playing pool for money and the making of the movie that made him famous.  He said that the most he ever played for, in one game, was $20,000 (I've seen him quoted elsewhere that the most was 30,000.  It's hard to believe that he got the 30K game after the day I met him, as he was in his 60's already.  Maybe he was just fuzzy on the number; really good apple pie can do that to some folks).

He isn't credited for an advisory role in the movie, but he claimed to have been there, in that capacity.  I asked him if he played pool on the set with Willie Mosconi, and he said they all did...Eddie, Willie, Jackie Gleason, and Paul Newman.  "And the best of them?"

"Hands down...Jackie Gleason."

True story.

Efficiency & Economy of Action

Dear Reader, if you use this space to scroll through my bloglist as a "reading favorites file" (which is a totally worthwhile exercise all by itself), you'll have already read excerpts of this essay, or followed through the links to read the source entirely, at either Western Rifle Shooters or Cold Fury.  If you have one ounce of give-a-damn left, about what happens to you and anyone you care about, go read this today...please.

Take the time you'd otherwise piss away on the Braves game or The View or even Duck Dynasty, and read this thing.  It's a blog post by a taxi driver, and the most important news you'll have gotten thus far, this year.

Wheeler said, “I believe in efficiency and economy of action. You wouldn’t trade one hundred of those criminal bastards for ten million of your fellow Americans?”

And, chew on this paragraph:

But whatever you do, when your kid dies, don’t do news conferences, don’t start blogging, don’t start calling out the government publicly, don’t become an activist, don’t go on FOX News, and definitely don’t become an embarrassment or a pain in the ass to this government, lest you find yourself being gang-audited by the IRS, if not declared a terrorist and having your door kicked in by armored agents at 4 in the morning, who are here to shoot your dog, terrorize the rest of your kids, and to take you to an undisclosed location in zip ties, where there are no lawyers, no phones, no sunlight, the food really sucks, and no one can confirm or deny that they have ever heard of you.

Most of the time, I feel very much alone...here, in the blogosphere and in everyday life.  And, that's okay.  Being outspoken makes others uncomfortable, and everyone who knows me prefers the unserious me to the serious version.  Hell, I prefer the unserious me, too!  But, very soon, my habit of sticking my thumb in the tyrant's eyeball is going to reap some unpleasant repercussions for this livermush aficionado.

If you'll read it, you'll gain a thorough understanding of my outlook.  An even better idea would be to read it and print it out.  Then, read it again when (not if) I'm arrested.

Harry Reidses There, Here, and Everywhere

The Bundy's won the battle, and the BLM skedaddled.  It's a victory for America, Americans, and the concept of individual (and state) sovereignty.  But, we are already hearing about the Federales' plans to ratchet up the numbers and firepower of their forces.  Harry says it ain't over, and I firmly believe it.

On Harry's side, believe it or not, is Tucker Carlson.  Last night, he said that the "bottom line" is that the Bundy's are violating the law, and that it's hard to get behind them knowing that.

My response to Tucker is "which law?"  If the federal government passes a law that says that no one is henceforward allowed to contradict Juan Williams on Faux News' All-Star Panel, is Tucker just going to move his cattle off that show?  In an "America" where the federal government makes laws that perpetuate their own scope of authority, enforces laws when/if that suits their agenda, uses their own federal court system to reinforce their "rights", and brazenly flaunts the supreme law of the land, all while consistently working to file down the 2A teeth of that law, at what point do you begin to feel like some civil disobedience (and that of the uncivil kind) might be warranted?

Note to Tucker: You're next.  Don't think you've done anything to merit the heavy hand of government thuggery?  Either they haven't caught you yet, or they haven't enforced that regulation yet, or Juan Williams' equality lobbyist hasn't quite yet gotten to enough "legislators" to crony up a deal that disfavors you and "your kind".  The bottom line is that everything is against the law, and you're as guilty as Cliven Bundy.

Just a passing thought...I wonder what the "Bing Pulse" registered when viewers saw two lefties on the Panel, and the first words coming from the one "good guy" were to highlight the illegality of an American hero's cattle, echoing the sentiments of the BLM!

And a note to those "SWATting"-up, and everyone watching: you're going to meet some fierce comeuppance in Bunkerville...but, that's not the only neighborhood with tyrants who are worthy targets of opportunity.  That is, Bunkerville is a fine place to get in this fight, but with fuel prices as they are, some of us may just elect to exercise our right to purge government of our own versions of Dingy Harry.  Call it thinking globally, acting locally.

Happy Fred's Birthday y'all.  No report filing to the tyrants from this house; no other significance to this date.  We've withdrawn our consent, and with it our funds.

Why?

Because when government refuses to abide by the law, there is no law.

And fuck you, that's why.

Gettin' Sporty

For those of you, friends and family and such, that have referred to this soapbox of mine as something you "tolerate", either to my face or to each other in my absence, consider what your brand of tolerance is getting you.  That is, what else have you proven willing to tolerate?

Your side has snipers aimed at ranchers.  And, they've got attack dogs and barricades keeping witnesses at bay, or otherwise in their place (i.e. their "free speech zones").

I don't necessarily advocate subscribing to everything Alex Jones says, but this video contains an interview with the rancher in question, Cliven Bundy.  Tell me he doesn't remind y'all of somebody we all know, appearance-wise at least, anyway, if certainly not for a divergent degree of chumminess with the fedgovco.



Some of Bundy's neighbors have voiced a lack of support for him, because they believe he's presumed some benefits to this grazing land that they can't or haven't similarly claimed.  If they want to withhold their support, that's all well and good.  But, if they want to side with the BLM who's busy stealing this man's cattle and beating his son for having the audacity to photograph them doing so, then I say they have their own agenda that would love to supplant Mr. Bundy's cattle, and fuck them.

Just like the war on guns is NOT about the control of firearms, this episode is about putting citizens under the ever-enlarging thumb of the federal government.  If you're okay with them taking his cattle today, regardless of how they "justify" it, tomorrow it'll be your fruit trees or guitar factory or the spring where your family has gotten its fresh clean water for 150 years.  Somebody, somewhere has a desert tortoise or sage grouse or spotted newt whose perilous existence you're threatening just by going about your own business without the tyrant's permission and regulatory control.


If a political solution were possible, there'd be some Nevada legislator(s) publicly demanding the Nevada State Police begin evicting the BLM thugs, instead of making speeches to the assembled Nevada citizens that are there protesting.  Or, there'd be a Governor publically admonishing the BLM to back off.

But there ain't.  And the concept of voting our way out of this hole is now ancient history.

The solution to a tyrant drunk on its own power is defiance and resistance.  Perhaps we can resume the polite discourse sometime later.

Here, we're keeping an eye to Free North Carolina, WRSA, Sipsey Street, Cold Fury, et al until it gets hot.  But I dare say our tolerance is about shot to fuck.

Go ahead mister BLM sniper boy, mister thug-arm of the tyrant.  Pull that trigger.  Make your kind just as endangered as that desert tortoise, if not much more so.

See 'Ya There

Maybe just because we do love a good fight, and feel like well, if there's going to be a fight, it's bound to go better if we're in it.

From Brock, and WRSA.

Tar Heels.  Stickin' and fightin'.

Pwned.

Edit: Or better yet, call D'Souza the Baracket Buster.

Brilliant.



Thanks to Breitbart.com

Okay, Well, Not So Much

In a previous life, I said that my opinions differ from Josie The Outlaw's less than a "thimbleful in the ocean."  Well, that was then.  She could've just quit while she was ahead.

And she is entitled to her opinion.  This is just one opinion I do not share: Supporting The Troops (her definition...I'll link to it, but not embed it).

Women should by their nature be doves.  So, their pretending any authority in regards to war is inane and presumptuous.  This youtube event is proof positive that if you listen to any woman long enough, you may come 'round to regret having ever started.

"To celebrate the many lives lost on all sides, by innocent men, women, and children...I support them quitting the military and coming home...I support ALL human beings, including those human beings targeted by US troops..."

Well, fuck that.

I support being a warrior for the essence of being a warrior.  And, I don't ask for anyone else to agree with me or any other warrior.  I support the notion of a warrior always being a him, and never a her.  Whether it's David smiting Goliath, Leonidas fighting in the shade of Xerxes' arrows, or Dan Morgan tomahawk chopping his way through waves of redcoats, the glory of battle is beyond the comprehension of the wimmen-folk.  And the involvement of said wimmen-folk queers the deal for warriors on both sides.

There aren't any "innocent bystanders".  Only the foolish.  Get in the fight, or get out of the way.

Let the politicians lay claim to the soldiers' victory.  I submit that the true warrior cares very little for political claims and so-called "support."  When I die, I hope I've either lived or died well enough that I can stand before my God and say that I killed as many of our enemies, His and mine, as I could.  His Blessings are the only "support" I'll ever give a shit about.

Fighting to defend your home or family or way of life is honorable, too.  But, if all you ever prove willing to fight is a defensive war, you'll fight a lot more of them than if you're willing to occasionally walk up to a bad guy and bust his nose.

I do not expect women, or for that matter all the Beta-males of the world, to have much of a sense of honor regarding battle.  But, I would appreciate their not waxing expert on things they so-poorly comprehend.

"Heavily armed and bloodthirsty."  Just for the glory of it.